Exploring the Pros and Cons of the New 99% Mortgages in the UK

The new 99% mortgages being considered in the UK are aimed at assisting first-time buyers to get onto the property ladder by significantly lowering the initial deposit requirement to just 1% of the property's value. This approach is seen as a potential boost for those struggling to save for a deposit while renting, especially in high-cost areas like London. However, there are both potential benefits and risks associated with such high loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages.

Pros

1. Lower Deposit Requirement:

The primary advantage of a 99% mortgage is the dramatically reduced deposit needed to purchase a home. For would-be homeowners, particularly in expensive markets, this can make the difference between being able to afford a home or not  

2. Increased Accessibility:

These mortgages could significantly increase accessibility to the housing market for first-time buyers, enabling those who have been trapped in a cycle of renting and unable to save a sufficient deposit  

3. Government Support:

The risk to lenders is diminished through government guarantees, along with the continuation of robust affordability checks, potentially unlocking a new wave of buyers

Cons

1. Risk of Negative Equity:

High LTV mortgages carry a greater risk of negative equity, where a homeowner owes more on their mortgage than their home is worth, particularly if property values fall. This risk could leave buyers unable to move or refinance and could lead to financial strain if they need to sell at a loss  

2. Affordability Concerns:

Despite the lower deposit requirement, high property prices in areas like London might still make these mortgages unaffordable for many, as mortgage affordability checks take into account borrowers' incomes and outgoings, not just the deposit  

3. Potential for Market Inflation:

There's concern that the introduction of 99% mortgages could inflate property prices further by increasing demand without addressing the underlying supply issues in the housing market. This could exacerbate the affordability crisis in the long run and lead to a cycle of higher prices and increased borrowing

4. Historical Precedents:

The proposal echoes the pre-2008 financial crisis era when mortgages of 100% or more of the property's value were common, leading to widespread negative equity and financial instability when the housing market crashed.

Alternatives suggested include focusing on increasing the supply of affordable housing and considering schemes that could help renters directly buy out their landlords under favourable terms, addressing both the supply side of the housing market and providing more sustainable pathways to homeownership

The debate around 99% mortgages underscores the complexity of addressing the housing affordability crisis in the UK. While they offer a potential lifeline to first-time buyers, the risks and historical precedents caution against seeing them as a silver bullet solution.

‍